Explain how the opposing arguments do not align with your thesis rather than dismissing them outright. Consider the other points of view when collecting anecdotal and statistical evidence. Overcome objections by covering both sides of the issue. Consider arguments against your thesis.
Signal refutations with transition words such as "but," "however," or "although. Synthesize the information to leave a lasting impression on the reader. Link the last paragraph to the introduction and reiterate a key word or phrase used in the beginning.
Conclude with a quotation from a primary reference, redefine a key term, or set your argument in a larger context by demonstrating how your paper falls within a larger area of concern or by posing further questions. Nicole Newman is a Dartmouth College associate who works in Tiltfactor Laboratory, Dartmouth's premier game design center.
Her research has included investigating the digital humanities through "Writing as a Dimensional Artifact" and "Evolution of the Ghetto: How to Write a Controversial Essay. How to Write an Opposing Viewpoint Essay. Accessed 14 September Depending on which text editor you're pasting into, you might have to add the italics to the site name. Warnings Proofread carefully for grammar and spelling errors.
Double-check your source information and documentation. Things Needed Pen Paper. Purdue Online Writing Lab: Especially an author and a critic… like Steven Johnson and Dana Stevens. The two have opposing views on the topic. Both these writers use different examples of ethos, pathos, and logos in their articles to back up their opinion and make for an interesting argument.
In my opinion, Dana Stevens overall did a better job at using ethos, pathos, and logos to back up her argument. This quote is what Steven really tries to prove the whole article and back up with her arguments. Ethos has to do with credibility and trustworthiness. This technique is used to make people seem credible and someone whom we respect.
D in comparative literature from the University of California at Berkeley. If the author has earned her a Ph. D in comparative literature that gives her credibility because she has had to go through a lot of years of schooling and she has a lot of writing experience by now after getting a job in the field. Steven Johnson used ethos the best in his argument.
In the beginning he is introduced as: The Natural History of Innovation Johnson is also a contributing editor for Wired, writers a monthly column for Discover, and teachers journalism at New York University. He is the author of seven other books and list them all. It then goes on to say Johnson is a contributing editor for Wired, he writers a monthly column for Discover, and teachers journalism at New York University. All of these things about Johnson give him a lot of credibility to begin with.
Pathos has to do with appealing to your audiences emotion. Using imaginative impact, and stories can convince your audience of your argument by creating an emotional response. Tone is also a huge part of pathos, the way you state your argument can have a impact on their opinion. Dana Stevens wants to expose Steven Johnsons article and she does so by using pathos to get to the audiences emotions.
The mention of endorsement of torture usually makes people feel very disgusted and upset because of their morals. Steven Johnson uses pathos to get in touch with the audiences feelings by using TV shows that go against any normal persons morals. He used shows that brought up a lot of public controversies.
The episode that was shown on the twenty-fourth only fanned the flames higher: It will also really get people into their emotions too. Something that is out of the norm like that will also get into peoples emotions. The other scene brought up about the secretary of defense authorizing the torture of his son to uncover evidence of a terrorist plot would take anyone by surprise and most likely feel disgusted. As a parent you should always want to protect your child… not torture them, so imagine how an audience would feel especially parents after reading about this.
It would most definitely catch their attention and get in touch with their feelings.
Ellen Friedrichs and Trayce Hensen are two of many that have opposing viewpoints on homosexuality whether a family does not have to include a mother and father or .
An opposing viewpoint essay calls for a student to investigate a topic and evaluate the evidence supporting one side of an argument. This type of essay calls for extensive research of literature and, at times, empirical research through surveys and interviews.
Opposing Viewpoints essays"The only way in which a human being can make some approach to knowing the whole of a subject is by hearing what can be said about it by persons of every variety of opinion and studying all modes in which it can be looked at by every character of mind. "Opposing Viewpoints" Essays and Research Papers Opposing Viewpoints practiced and combined their actor training methods, specifically Suzuki training and Anne Bogart’s area of expertise and system of creating theatre: the Viewpoints training.
The two have opposing views on the topic. Both these writers use different examples of ethos, pathos, and logos in their articles to back up their opinion and make for an interesting argument. In my opinion, Dana Stevens overall did a better job at using ethos, pathos, and logos to back up her argument. When it comes to viewpoints there will always be an opposing side. You must develop your strongly focused opinion with examples and/or reasons. In order for a reader to accept your side you must use clear, powerful, and direct language to really capture them.